ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: Policy Statement on the Day Pass Experiment

2010-05-10 10:40:01

On May 7, 2010, at 10:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:

And, yes, a regular IETF participant who attended the last
meeting on a day pass should have been able to know whether that
would count for the Nomcom qualification or not.  But nothing
prevented a person in that position from asking the question
before he or she registered, in which case we would,
appropriately, have had this discussion prior to Anaheim.

Well, being such a person, before I registered for a day pass I did not 
consider the NOMCOM ramifications.  If I had, I think it would likely that I 
would simply have assumed the existing BCP were in force.

I argue that what the IETF now proposes is not a clarification to the BCP but a 
change to the BCP.   Applying such changes retroactively stinks.

So, I guess I won't have NOMCOM eligible this year (due to the change, assuming 
I attend the next IETF under a full registration).

-- Kurt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>