Phillip,
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Am I the only person that thinks that if shaving 50ms off HTTP latency is a
worthwhile goal it would be more appropriate to look at a DNS based signaling
mechanism that is going to support that goal (and also do the right thing for
IPv4/6) rather than look at various ways to coax the desired behavior from
the legacy infrastructure.
How would a DNS-based signaling mechanism work when DNS servers do not
necessarily know anything about the state of connectivity to the server they
provide name service for?
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf