On 7/6/2010 2:45 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 2010-07-06 03:56, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 5 jul 2010, at 18:05, Alissa Cooper wrote:
1) Respond on this list if you support the idea of the IETF having
a privacy policy (a simple "+1" will do).
I'm torn between "good to have this written down" and "do we really
need to go out and look for more process work".
2) If you have comments and suggestions about the policy itself,
send them to this list.
What I'm missing is what happens with the information described under
"Registering to attend a meeting or social event:", there are no
retention periods mentioned (that I noticed).
the trust's records retention policy already deals with registration.
These records are constrained by a number of privacy statutes which
cannot be signed away. That is why this must be done outside the IETF's
normal process.
What should happen is that a committee should produce this and then that
be formally disclosed to the entire IETF membership - meaning every
member of every list, the IESG, IRTF, and IAOC as well.
That way positive disclosure can be accomplished. This also should be
redone on a yearly basis to reinforce this mandate.
Todd
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf