ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ad Hoc BOFs

2010-08-03 11:59:13
Throwing a draft at the IETF without a lot of supporting work rarely gets
anywhere, but some people find it hard to figure out just what "supporting"
work is actually effective and to execute on it. It's the non-procedural
parts of the IETF process that confound people, and lead to various end
runs. I suspect that the way to lessen the number of "on the edge"
activities is to (1) encourage interim meetings including BOFs with good
teleconferencing, and (2) make the process for getting work considered in
the IETF even more procedural than it is, to make it easier for sumner to
work with it.

On Jul 30, 2010 3:07 PM, "Yoav Nir" <ynir(_at_)checkpoint(_dot_)com> wrote:


On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:

Yoav Nir wrote:
First is people who have an...
True.


The implication that there needs to be a session, with a room
and slides and humans sitting in ...
There doesn't need to be, but that is one way to do things. There are
hundreds of drafts posted every week. We all ignore most of them. A short
presentation might get enough people interested to start a discussion on
some mailing list.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.o...
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>