I agree. Unfortunate comparison of two cities.
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Sunday, August 29, 2010 15:59 -0700 Ole Jacobsen
<ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
John,
I agree 100% with everything you said here, execpt for the
part about "we don't get it". I don't think I need to go over
again why Maastricht was chosen nor elaborate further on the
surprises we encountered onsite, so let's just say that we
will try to do better next time and move on.
I am really uninterested in discussing the Maastricht situation
further except insofar as I think there are lessons in it that
have not been absorbed yet.
I would feel much more confident about who does and does not
"get it" were it not for Ray's little survey equating Maastricht
and Minneapolis. If that difference (fairly significant
international airport with good connections from several others,
easy and fairly quick transport from airport to hotel, in-hotel
meeting in hotel large enough to accommodate most of us, several
other hotels within easy walking distance, a large variety of
nearby eating places, ... versus "none of the above") wasn't
painfully clear long before the survey was sent out, then
_someone_ doesn't get it.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf