Dave Crocker wrote:
But, Fred, the problem really is with having such a varied population of
attendees and then experimenting with new venues every time. This guarantees
problems, because the varied population means that there is a complex set of
requirements. No, all of the issues cannot be anticipated, nevermind
resolved.
However a resource-rich venue that is visited repeatedly means that the
choices are much greater and that a learning curve can develop.
I strongly resonate with this insight. The IETF has repeatedly returned to
certain sites many times. Not all of them are desirable -- note, for example,
Minneapolis in winter. However, the fact that we have been to those sites many
times have made them a known entity which has fostered productive work.
On the other hand, novel sites are interesting, enable new people to attend,
show support for different language groups, and foster memorable events
(tourism).
The question for the group to decide is what are we trying to accomplish and
what venues best assist us attaining our goals.
Best wishes,
--Eric
PS: For those who note that it has been a long time since I have attended an
IETF, let me merely note that I attend every IETF that is in Vancouver and that
remote site locations impact my ability to attend.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf