Mary;
Would you want the comments that are currently sent in privately to nomcom to
become public, or do you want the voters to make their choices without hearing
these comments?
Ross
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:52 PM
To: Peter Saint-Andre
Cc: John C Klensin; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Requirement to go to meetings
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(_at_)stpeter(_dot_)im<mailto:stpeter(_at_)stpeter(_dot_)im>> wrote:
On 10/26/11 1:47 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
(e.g., the NomCom
schedule is defined in terms of three meetings a year).
no problem. We stop having the nomcom.
Sure, we just set up a (two-tier?) membership structure and have all the
members vote. Easy.
[MB] You don't need a membership structure to have voting - you just allow
anyone that has attended the requisite number of meetings per the Nomcom
process to vote - i.e., if you are qualified to be a voting member of the
Nomcom, you can vote. I personally believe that voting would be better than
the current model. As it is, a very small percentage of the participants
actually contribute to the process in the form of nominating or providing
feedback:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00 (section 6.2)
So, making it easier to provide input in the form of a vote might actually get
more folks caring about who the leaders are. It would also save a tremendous
amount of work on the part of the folks that serve on the Nomcom. [/MB]
[Also, ducking]
Mary.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf