Hi John,
Just responding to one specific concern (No. 3) you raised. I do
believe that the other 3 (Nos. 1, 2 and 4) require process changes that
cannot take place during the current nomcom cycle.
On 11-10-27 11:25 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
...snipped...
(3) I don't believe it has happened this year, but trends in the
community predict that, sooner or later, we will have someone
volunteer for a large number of positions simply because he or
she (or whomever they work for) wants them in the IETF
leadership. Someone ought to be able to write one comment that
says "Goofy wants to be in the leadership to enhance his resume
and told several of us that at a Bar BOF and should not be
selected for _any_ position. If you don't believe me alone,
check with X, Y, or Z." In the current model, that would
require writing a separate review for each position. Lots of
make-work; might not happen at all. But a Nomcom would really
want that input I think.
You can already do this today. Just enter your feedback about the
nominee into *any* one of the positions and state that it is for all the
positions. The tool does not handle this case, but the humans behind
certainly do.
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf