SM,
(it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name).
Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and
others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value.
See below:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:
[...]
Thomas Heide Clausen commented [2] about draft-cardenas-dff-09 [4]. I don't
know the person (zero reputation). You also posted a review [3]. The first
review is clearer.
[...]
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77078.html
3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77089.html
4. I glanced at the draft. Section 2.2 is about terminology. Section 14.1.1
also mentions terminology. There are different definitions for "Address".
I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to
this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document,
I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation".
There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned
draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread.
Best
Ulrich