Alright, thanks
Ulrich
On Feb 11, 2013, at 15:36, SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
At 13:25 11-02-2013, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
(it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name).
Agreed.
Your comment reminded me of the message at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep/current/msg00085.html
Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and
others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value.
See below:
Agreed.
I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to
this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document,
It was a gentle note to one of the authors (see Note 4).
I pointed to two reviews about a draft and mentioned that the first one was
clearer to me.
I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation".
There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned
draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread.
I agree that it is better to stick to the topic. I'll answer in here as to
avoid generating two messages. I meant that I have never interacted with the
person through email or in person. There is less bias [1]. The content of
the message matters; it does not matter who wrote it.
Regards,
-sm
1. www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/notes/snodgrass-tods-2007.pdf