I believe the five-author limit is not as strict:
(see, e.g., RFC6550)
Ulrich
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
wrote:
Actually, as there's already a five-author limit on RFCs, acks are already
subject to guidance...
Did rfc2223bis expire? Section 2.12 there.
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Melinda
Shore [melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: 25 March 2013 16:20
To: Scott Brim
Cc: John C Klensin; dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; ietf
Subject: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
On 3/25/13 8:17 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
or a statement that acknowledgments is not a required section and not
subject to IETF guidance.
Excellent.
Melinda