ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

2013-03-25 11:17:52
On 03/25/13 11:54, "John C Klensin" <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> allegedly 
wrote:
So perhaps a little more guidance to authors and WGs about
acknowledgments would be in order.

or a statement that acknowledgments is not a required section and not
subject to IETF guidance.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>