RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

RFCs say how, but rarely why.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________


Elwyn said

As regards 'history': RFCs record 'state' and not history.  That isn't

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, (continued) Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Melinda Shore RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, l.wood Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Abdussalam Baryun Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Loa Andersson Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Peter Saint-Andre Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John C Klensin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Abdussalam Baryun Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Abdussalam Baryun Message not available Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, SM Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Elwyn Davies RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, l.wood <= Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Brian E Carpenter Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Arturo Servin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Dave Crocker Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John C Klensin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Scott Kitterman Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John C Klensin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Dave Crocker Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Scott Brim Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Melinda Shore RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, l.wood