RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

ietf

RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

2013-03-25 16:57:44

from [l.wood]


Actually, as there's already a five-author limit on RFCs, acks are already 
subject to guidance...

Did rfc2223bis expire? Section 2.12 there.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Melinda Shore [melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: 25 March 2013 16:20
To: Scott Brim
Cc: John C Klensin; dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; ietf
Subject: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

On 3/25/13 8:17 AM, Scott Brim wrote:

or a statement that acknowledgments is not a required section and not
subject to IETF guidance.


Excellent.

Melinda

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, (continued) RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, l.wood Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Brian E Carpenter Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Arturo Servin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Dave Crocker Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John C Klensin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Scott Kitterman Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John C Klensin Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Dave Crocker Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Scott Brim Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Melinda Shore RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, l.wood <= Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Ulrich Herberg Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Joe Abley Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, John Curran Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Sam Hartman "Acknowledgements" vs new Contributions section., Hector Santos Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Hector Santos Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt, Jiazi Yi

Previous by Date:	Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Donald Eastlake
Next by Date:	Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, joel jaeggli
Previous by Thread:	Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Melinda Shore
Next by Thread:	Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Ulrich Herberg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]