Re: [IETF] Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "A

ietf

Re: [IETF] Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections)

2013-03-25 17:59:46


On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Stephen Farrell 
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:


Hi Lloyd,

On 03/25/2013 10:03 PM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:

(i'm just commenting on this thread so that when it results in an I-D 
recommending how to write acks, I get acked…)


+1

W

P.S: :-P


Thanks! Yours is the first useful thing anyone's said in this
thread that I recall. (Most previous mails made me groan with
embarrassment that we wrap ourselves around axles like this so
easily, but yours gave me a chuckle, and is hence far more
useful:-)

S.


--
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
                -- H. L. Mencken

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, (continued) Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, t.p. Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, joel jaeggli Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Joel M. Halpern Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Paul Hoffman It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Carsten Bormann Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Abdussalam Baryun Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Joel M. Halpern Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Donald Eastlake RE: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), l.wood Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Stephen Farrell Re: [IETF] Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Warren Kumari <= Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Paul Hoffman Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Carsten Bormann Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Dave Crocker Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Sam Hartman Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Hector Santos Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Glen Zorn Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Fernando Gont Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Abdussalam Baryun Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Melinda Shore Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Abdussalam Baryun

Previous by Date:	Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Stephen Farrell
Next by Date:	Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-06, Ted Lemon
Previous by Thread:	Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Stephen Farrell
Next by Thread:	Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections), Paul Hoffman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]