Some people never recognise new comers ideas until backed up with old
comer idea. Do you think that is right? I agree with your suggestion
only if the IETF editor team agree to include you in the possibility
of produce team ideas. I don't think all working groups in the IETF
are giving chance to people/mew-comers to involve/participate, my
experience that I am ignored, so the best way to be valuable for
future reader, is not to let some team to exclude others. From my
experience, I see that some teams just want their document to go
through IESG without comments/delays. Do you think that is good for
the process? This ignorance should be fixed.
AB
On 3/25/13, Melinda Shore <melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 3/24/13 10:02 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
I like what we have so far, but are those connected
processes/information reflected into the produced document? Why
ignoring names of volunteers? I suggest to fix this,
My experience over lo, these many years is that the best way to ensure
that you're recognized is to produce text/suggestions/ideas that other
people find valuable.
Melinda