On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Dale R. Worley <worley(_at_)ariadne(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I've advocated the equivalent of the following opinion before
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77479.html), but
in the current context it bears repeating: Here in the IETF we accept
that low-status people may argue regarding technical matters, but
reserve for high-status people having opinions about our procedures.
I thought your original message (the one you cite above) was very good, but I'm
not sure I like the terms "low-status" and "high-status," simply because tey
could be easily taken to mean something other than what I think you intend them
to mean.