Hi,
yes, we are monitoring this effort. The reason why it has not been
chartered yet is a lack of cycles in the main proponents, who are
fairly busy contributing to other aspects of RTCWeb (among other
things). Richard is the responsible AD for this effort.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
On 04/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 12/2/13 10:15 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
We had a videocodec bof @IETF-85 and the WG just never got
chartered: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF85.
Perhaps the ADs can fill in the gap as to why that didn't happen
as I'm not sure whether a ball was dropped or there was a reason
not to charter.
Yes, it would be helpful to hear from the ADs about that.
Peter