Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

        Sure, but that isn't a good excuse IMHO. I don't think anyone should 
approach me personally, but 
there are WG chair/WG/all-WG-chair mailing lists that are commonly used to 
communicate with the IETF leadership
and participants.

        But that is diverging from my original point. Why is there so much 
corporate advertising and branding on this?
Why can't we just use an IETF web/wiki for this?  Its a bit offensive to be 
courted with signup for Cisco's dev net program
after clicking on an apparently IETF-sponsored link. The point I was making 
earlier is that its inappropriate based 
on the IETF's past approach to these things. No one has given a good reason why 
either.

        --Tom



> On Feb 25, 2015:12:04 PM, at 12:04 PM, Ted Lemon 
> <Ted(_dot_)Lemon(_at_)nominum(_dot_)com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Thomas Nadeau 
> <tnadeau(_at_)lucidvision(_dot_)com> wrote:
> > No one approached us for this either.
> Nobody has visibility into all the activities of the IETF.   The way 
> volunteer organizations work is that people scratch their own itch, and 
> hopefully it's of collective benefit.   If this hackathon is a good idea (as 
> a lot of people seem to believe) then it would be great if, now that it's 
> been floated and is going to be tried, the next hackathon had more broad 
> involvement of the community.
>
> But the expectation that someone will approach you is kind of absurd.   If 
> you want to be involved, approach the people who are already involved.   
> Don't wait for them to approach you.   Of course, you didn't know about this 
> in advance--the first I heard of it was less than a week ago.   But now you 
> know, and there are plans to do this at IETF 93; if you think a general 
> hackathon framework at the IETF would be a good place for the yang hackathon 
> work you are doing, then you should be involved in planning the IETF 93 
> hackathon.