On 2015-7-7, at 10:01, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
It is not an obligation but a request, and there is a very big
difference. Further, if what we are talking about is adding a DOI a
reference entry, what is the big deal? In fact, if there is a known DOI
all the better to find the source, especially for external references.
Why *wouldn't* we encourage that?
+1
And if we have to add a "no_doi" option to the xml2rfc vocabulary to appease
those that don't want their references polluted by DOIs, that's a possibility.
Kinda silly, because we'd be spending development cash on a feature that
probably few folks would care to use, but we could.
Lars