On 7/7/2015 10:28 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
Uh, no. I want it to be /easy/ to expand into those other
uses. Not 'required' of course but easy if we wish to.
Wfm, modulo the observations you have already made about the
costs of making supposedly-transitory documents permanent. You
Huh? I did not make any comment about such a cost.
didn't include, e.g., Jabber logs of WG meetings in your lists,
but we could, in principle, apply DOIs to those too.
That was the reason for the ellipsis, John. I wasn't trying to be
complete and in fact my point about that was that trying to be complete
right now is a mistake.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net