On 7/9/2015 9:33 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Did anyone earlier ask the RFC Editor to change the reference format
for RFCs from RFCxyzw to urn:ietf:rfc:xyzw? (I gather you are asking
now, but objecting because it was not done when it was not asked seems
strange. Remember that this has been brought to the communities
attention several times in the past.)
Joel, shouldn't that be urn:isoc:rfc:xyzw?
Bob Braden
--
Robert Braden
Internet and Networked Systems Division
USC Information Sciences Institute
310.448.9173