ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation)

2015-12-18 15:31:29
Let me ask a question. I'm on the IAOC Meetings committee, which is an advisory 
committee that does some research (with AMS) and makes a recommendation to Ray, 
which he then takes to the IAOC. The IAOC sometimes agrees with us and 
sometimes doesn't. You will have just seen a note from Ray on this mailer 
detailing the IAOC's objectives in meeting planning; our committee, with strong 
involvement from AMS, does the investigative legwork to try to achieve those.

Right now, I am suggesting a model to Ray, based on a proposal that we have 
seen that would build a multi-meeting contract with a certain hotel. As with 
most business, matters, it would be inappropriate for me to discuss a contract 
below a certain level of detail. But in general terms, this proposal comes from 
a hotel that we have met in multiple times, had successful meetings, and as far 
as we know have met the objectives Ray outlined. We have list of places we have 
met in in which that wasn't true for one reason or another; we also have a set 
of locations that have worked better than the average, and done so on multiple 
occasions. Some of these are in Asia, some are in Europe, and some are in North 
America. Of probable interest to you: one of the sites I think mostly works is 
in Prague.

What I am suggesting to the IAOC is that, over the coming 9 years (27 
meetings), we meet 9 times in Asia (and maybe that includes ANZ), 9 times in 
Europe (and maybe that includes Africa), and 9 times in the Americas. Of those, 
I am suggesting that we meet 3 of the 9 Asian times in a particular hotel that 
has worked well for us in that part of the world, 6 of the 9 European times in 
two hotels that have worked well for us in Europe, and in 9 of the 9 "Americas" 
times, meet in 3 hotels that have worked well for us in the past in the US and 
Canada. Our world tour would begin to have aspects of a rotation. For that to 
happen, I am suggesting that we ask these specific locations whether they, too, 
would be interested in a multi-meeting contract, and to propose terms for such 
meetings.

Folks from Latin America (e.g., South and Central, generally spanish-speaking 
and portuguese-speaking) will object on the grounds that they would like to be 
included in the rotation. I can respond to that in a couple of ways, one of 
which is that I honestly don't expect to get proposals for 3 meetings in 9 
years from each of the 3 North American hotels on my little list. Also, we can 
probably expect a little flexibility in contracting that would allow us to 
insert a Latin American location by moving one of the venues out a little bit. 
I think the problem is solvable.

What this does is give us a set of locations, for as many as 18 of the coming 
27 meetings, that we know work for the IETF and its purposes, because they have 
in the past. It also gives us at least 9 of the coming 27 meetings in which we 
can explore locations such as you advocate.

What will be the problems with placing those meetings? North America is frankly 
not too hard. Europe takes a little more effort, especially in finding a 
suitable host. Asia/ANZ - we put a lot of effort into that. The locations that 
can offer us the number of bedrooms and breakout rooms we need, can honestly 
discuss having 1500 people walk out of a meeting at 11:30 and return by 13:00, 
and are near major hub or regional airports in Asia is a little thin, and where 
we find them, they are expensive.

Let me ask, since you clearly have opinions on such matters - what would you 
think of such an arrangement? What am I missing in such a proposal?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>