Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
It is fast looking as if the ability to sustain a large and very
well-attended network of interconnected remote hubs might become a
necessity rather than merely an appealing alternative...
+1
(and this will require some formal process for mike queuing at
the "interconnected remote hubs".)
IMHO, what's lacking is _only_ the will to make it happen. ;^)
--
John Leslie <john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net>