ken wrote:
I'm not fond of the idea of the new pseudo-component you created called "hidden". I know you can use it as a boolean, but defining it to a fixed string seems wrong to me. There is an existing function called %(unseen); I think it would be perfect for this. The way you pass in values to unseen is via the "dat" array
and right you were. this seems cleaner, and the name works nicely. new draft patch attached. paul ---------------------- paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma, where it's 49.6 degrees)
0001-mhshow-apply-marker-form-to-all-part-separators.patch
Description: 0001-mhshow-apply-marker-form-to-all-part-separators.patch
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers