Second, there is no reason (other than bile between Jim Bidzos and Phil Zimmerman) that US users could not be licensed to use PGP. Indeed, I suspect that any company with an RSA license (Sun, IBM, Apple, Microsoft,...) is already licensed to run PGP, or any other program that makes use of RSA -- at least if they keep track of the number of inhouse users and pay the appropriate royalty.
There's really no reason why PGP couldn't be rewriten to use rsaref either. brad
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Unique DNs, Carl Ellison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Naming problem as a symptom, Brad Huntting |
Previous by Thread: | Re: PGP legality, David Sternlight |
Next by Thread: | Re: PGP legality, Derek Atkins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |