Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter

era eriksson <reriksso(_at_)cc(_dot_)helsinki(_dot_)fi> writes:

have it there, try replacing it with `fgrep -v Reply-To'. That should
simplify things.


Except with multiline Reply-To headers.


        Stefan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, (continued) Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, David W. Tamkin Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Lars Kellogg-Stedman Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, era eriksson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Robert Nicholson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, era eriksson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Stefan Monnier <= Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Lars Kellogg-Stedman Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Lars Kellogg-Stedman Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Eli the Bearded Newbie Help, Marcy Kulic Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Eli the Bearded Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, include "tiglet" on Subject: line to override spamgard{tm} Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Stan Ryckman Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, era eriksson Re: Another good one for your Procmail spam filter, Stan Ryckman