Re: SPAM on the procmail list

Quoting Marek Jedlinski (eristic(_at_)lodz(_dot_)pdi(_dot_)net):
> Matt Armstrong wrote:
> > Forgive me if this has all been hashed over before.
> Not nearly enough, I'm afraid. 
Now there's a debatable statement...once again we have one spam and two
(now three :-) useless responses to that spam...which was more
intrusive...

-- 
Michael Stone, Sysadmin, ITRI     PGP: key 1024/76556F95 from mit keyserver,
mstone(_at_)itri(_dot_)loyola(_dot_)edu            finger, or email with 
"Subject: get pgp key"