procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPAM on the procmail list

1997-08-12 07:48:00
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Michael Stone wrote:

Quoting Marek Jedlinski (eristic(_at_)lodz(_dot_)pdi(_dot_)net):
Matt Armstrong wrote:
Forgive me if this has all been hashed over before.
Not nearly enough, I'm afraid. 

Now there's a debatable statement...once again we have one spam and two
(now three :-) useless responses to that spam...which was more
intrusive...

Particularly since i don't seem to have seen the initial spam.  Did
another one come down the pike this week?  

-- 
Sattinger's Law:
        It works better if you plug it in.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>