Michael Stone <mstone(_at_)itri(_dot_)loyola(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Now there's a debatable statement...once again we have one spam and two
(now three :-) useless responses to that spam...which was more
intrusive...
Totally disagree, man. There is a certain slight... nay, HUGE irony in
the fact that Procmail is simultaneously fighting and abetting spam. I
can see no reason why it would constrain anyone's freedom to post if
basic spam filtering was implemented for the list.
You are now two cents richer.
RR
...Flying saucers are real; the Air Force doesn't exist.
--
in austin, texas <live music capital of the world!>
http://www.io.com/~areray Festina lente.
[or finger areray(_at_)io(_dot_)com for PGP public key and kewl .plan!]
"The sun is gonna shine... in our back yard... some day." :) :) :)