Re: SPAM on the procmail list1997-08-20 09:56:03Now there's a debatable statement...once again we have one spam and two (now three :-) useless responses to that spam...which was more intrusive...Particularly since i don't seem to have seen the initial spam. Did another one come down the pike this week? Good point. We can filter the spam--we have the technology. But what good is that when some people can't? If the spam gets through to ten people, the resulting complaints get through to everyone.
|
|