Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 8:43:52 AM, David W. Tamkin wrote:
DWT> First, Timothy, uninstall that horrible MUA you're using that messes with
DWT> "Re:"
Yeah I'm not thrilled with that either.
I'm trying (have not bought) TheBat as I'm trying to get an MUA more
robust that Outlook, which bites the big kaooey.
DWT> and send to eternal damnation (you can do that, can't you?) the creep
DWT> who tricked you into buying it. "
We try to minimize the eternal damnation stuff whenever possible ;-)
DWT> What happens if you add the `b' flag? Will metamail accept the headless
DWT> body and process it the way you want? Note that without the `B' flag
DWT> procmail will still search the head, not the body, for the regexp in the
DWT> condition, as you want.
metamail needs the header information to figure out the correct MIME
type encoding.
If I send it just the body, the filename for the attachment gets
mucked up, which is what I was trying to avoid.
DWT> If not, there's always this hack:
DWT> :0
DWT> * ^Content-Type: multipart/mixed
DWT> {
DWT> :0fwh
DWT> | sed -e1h -e1!H -e\$G
DWT> :0fwb #body now includes spare copy of head
DWT> | metamail -q -x
DWT> }
Oh, I like that :-)
Thanks -- that seems to work. I have to test it against some other
abominations like HTML mail, but this makes for a nice, clean
anti-MIME filter.
Once I have it tested and working better, I'll post it to the list in
its revised form.
Thanks!
TjL
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail