At 14:07 2008-05-15 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
(nod) Still doesn't lend relevance to the question of how his procmailrc
is handling his mail. Though it advances a strong argument for NOT using
procmail until the local recipient has been determined by an MTA... :)
Well, it continues to underscore that Procmail is not an MTA.
BTW, you ARE aware that your subject modification rules mess things up for
others, *AND* that your subject modification rules are re-inserting the
[pro] tag even when it is ALREADY present in the subject? Please fix it.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail