On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:25:03PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
To date, RHSBLs return either a DECLINE or NEGATIVE opinion. In the
future I predict we will see RHSBLs published by major ISPs that return
KNOWN, UNKNOWN, NEGATIVE, and DECLINE, constituting a weak reputation
scheme. Even finer grain is possible with "started sending mail N days
ago".
Including the information on which person/company registered the
domain would be even more useful. If the big registrars would feed
that information into a DNS-based database then that would be useful
too. If only some of the Registrars did so that would also tell
us something (esp. about the ones that don't).
I guess we have to have something like SPF working first before
it becomes attractive/useful/necessary.
--
Erik Corry erik(_at_)arbat(_dot_)com
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-replying such a bad thing?
A: Top-replying.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in email?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡