But do you want to be FORCED to use them? My post was not about "can
you use a proxy/whatever", but "do you believe that you should be FORCED
to use an ISP's application-layer gateways"? I find it hard to believe
you don't understand the distinction.
-- arlie
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Jim
Popovitch
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:18 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 03:50, Arlie Davis wrote:
Do you similarly rely on your ISP for FTP access, for HTTP access, for
IM access, etc.? Of course not.
Yes. Caching name servers, caching web servers, proxy servers, etc.
-Jim P.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡