spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf

2003-10-24 16:16:08


Don Koch wrote:

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:03:59PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
|
| the latest version of the draft has:
|
|   domain.com IN TXT "v=spf1..."
|
| with no prefix at all.

mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com said:
Oh, another good reason for the primary policy label to be domain.com 
instead
of _spf.domain.com: it makes things much easier for dyndns.com and
ultradns.com and so on to let customers configure their domains.


H'mmm

I can't admit to having spent much time delving at everyone else's level
into spf, but it is no more difficult for a user to configure in
UltraDNS. In both cases it is trivial.

Feel free to 
dig testspf.joffe.com txt
dig joffe.com txt

-- 
Rodney Joffe

Chairman and CTO
UltraDNS
CenterGate Research Group, LLC.
http://www.centergate.com
"Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(SM)

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>