On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:03:59PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
|
| the latest version of the draft has:
|
| domain.com IN TXT "v=spf1..."
|
| with no prefix at all.
mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com said:
Oh, another good reason for the primary policy label to be domain.com instead
of _spf.domain.com: it makes things much easier for dyndns.com and
ultradns.com and so on to let customers configure their domains.
And a bad reason is that it adds noise for other programs to have to try
to interpret.
What if other systems were to add top level TXT records? Spf would have to
wade through all of those; so, why make everyone else have to wade through
spf records? Putting it in _spf.domain.com would limit its scope for
all parties concerned.
-d
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡