In <20031114202709(_dot_)GE10172(_at_)thyrsus(_dot_)com> "Eric S. Raymond"
<esr(_at_)thyrsus(_dot_)com> writes:
Hmmmm...maybe this means we could drop the ugly pseudo-domain kludge and
just use TXT records attached to the actual domain at issue?
I don't think so. There is still the issue of the importance of
having the SPF info fitting into a single UDP packet. As mentioned
previously, many domains already have (too much) stuff in TXT records
at their domain level and a non-trivial number of firewalls and such
break DNS/TCP.
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡