Dan Boresjo <dan(_at_)boresjo(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>:
That's true. If it becomes an official RFC the neccessary RR's can
be assigned simultaneously. Hence the real RFC should only talk
about this new RR.
The TXT mechanism should be limited to pre-RFC trials. That way, the RFC
publication date automatically becomes the sunset date for TXT records.
If SPF never gets RFC status, well then we continue with TXT records in
perpetuity.
Agreed. I'd like to see it done this way.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡