On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Philip Gladstone wrote:
I think that the argument for using HTTP is fairly persuasive. In
particular, I can see a mechanism 'http' which takes a URL as an
argument. Thus we could do:
http://www.{%d}/cgi-bin/spf.cgi?sender=%{U}&ip=%{I}
Isn't this assuming that all sites that relay e-mail how have to run a
web server too, where they may have not done so before?
At least with DNS, you already have a DNS MX or A record pointing to you.
Adding another record is a whole lot less of a big deal than firing up a
whole new web server.
Tim
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡