Eric S. Raymond wrote:
spf(_at_)jdl(_dot_)com <spf(_at_)jdl(_dot_)com>:
So why not two-stage the development process in order to "get it right?"
Phase in the initial TXT records, but write the draft stating that it
will (er, should?) be migrate to new SPF RR records. Over time, it
can be migrated to real RR records then.
I fear that if we do it that way, the migration will never happen :-).
We could do the first draft as a full set of phases with dates
(changeable depending on when the draft is accepted) where specific
milestones must be met.
I'm starting to feel like this situation is:
A) fast-deployment
B) widespread-deployment
C) correct-deployment
Choose any 1.333
--Jonathan Steinert
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡