On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:01:01PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
| Which one is correct, the Perl script or the RFC? Are there plans to
| bring them into agreement?
The latest versions are:
draft-02.8.txt http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.8.txt
Mail::SPF::Query v1.8 http://spf.pobox.com/Mail-SPF-Query-1.8.tar.gz
I am uploading Mail::SPF::Query to CPAN now.
I apologize for the delay.
I plan to update the rest of the website over the weekend.
I'm still against double slashes for ip6, if someone dosn't read the spec
carefully they are going to end up using single slashes.
I propose changing:
dual-cidr-length = [ ip4-cidr-length ] [ ip6-cidr-length ]
ip4-cidr-length = [ '/' 1*DIGIT ]
ip6-cidr-length = [ '//' 1*DIGIT ]
to:
dual-cidr-length = [ ip4-cidr-length ] [ '/' ip6-cidr-length ]
ip4-cidr-length = [ '/' 1*DIGIT ]
ip6-cidr-length = [ '/' 1*DIGIT ]
--
[http://pointless.net/] [0x2ECA0975]
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡