spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What to include...

2004-10-04 15:19:42
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 03:40:18PM -0600, 
administrator(_at_)yellowhead(_dot_)com wrote:
| At 01:10 PM 10/4/2004 -0400, you wrote:
| >SPF classic, unified or whatever,  HELO checking is a requirement.  This was
| >all hashed out and established over 1 year ago.
| >
| >
| >Sincerely,
| >
| >Hector Santos, CTO
| ***************** REPLY SEPARATER *****************
| I am sorry, but I believe William is right. Although some people pressed
| for SPF checks on HELO as a requirement, all that was agreed to was SPF
| checks on HELO if MAIL FROM: was null. HELO checks for non-null were left
| as optional.
| 

they are optional for the receiver, but mandatory for the
publishing sender to accommodate.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>