Re: Re: What to include...

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 02:56:07 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote
> Dale Ghent <daleg(_at_)elemental(_dot_)org>:
> > I would like to see a SPF RR just for the sake of not overloading the 
> > meaning of the TXT RR.
> I concur, and have been saying the same thing for nearly twelve months.
I recall there was an issue with the Windows DNS resolver libraries being
hard-coded to only support the current RR types.  Has this been resolved 
somehow?