'Stephane Bortzmeyer' wrote:
The author views the RFCs as divided in two sets: those he
personally approve and which are implemented and those he
personally dislike and they are ignored.
That's how it should be done, you implement what you need,
and you do it as correctly as possible. You don't implement
any nonsense introduced later, or obsolete stuff last seen
in the 80s. And you document what you have implemented.
Read http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/
File not found (resp. access denied without slash). Bye, Frank