In <42A95F92(_dot_)9020605(_at_)metro(_dot_)cx> Koen Martens
<spf(_at_)metro(_dot_)cx> writes:
1. Change the text on http://spf.schlitt.net/contact_us.html, making
clear that it is not pobox processing the questions entered in the box,
but that there is a team of community volunteers. (example i posted
months ago)
Until recently, I have been explicitly ignoring all website requests
because I wanted to focus on the SPF I-D. If you could, please point
me to this post.
2. remove ' SMTP + SPF Sender Policy Framework an essential part of
Sender ID '
Agreed.
We should, however, probably do something to explain the relationship
somewhere so that when MS says that "SenderID supersedes SPF", we have
an official response.
3. Clear up the background reading section, make it clear that there is
only _one_ specification and which one this is
yes.
4. maybe longer term, but i'd like a page that shows mail servers, and
whether there is an spf implementation for that..
I think there already is a page for that.
5. make it clear on the why.html page that it is not a testing page, but
an error reporting page..
Hmmm... good point.
-wayne