--On Freitag, Juni 24, 2005 07:54:29 -0400 Hector Santos
<spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com> wrote:
[...]
Second, this was relaxed with RFC 2822, the current standard, by removing
the To: requirement:
0822 Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages. D.
Crocker. Aug-13-1982. (Format: TXT=109200 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC0733)
(Obsoleted by RFC2822) (Updated by RFC1123, RFC1138, RFC1148,
RFC1327, RFC2156) (Also STD0011) (Status: STANDARD)
2822 Internet Message Format. P. Resnick, Ed.. April 2001. (Format:
TXT=110695 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC0822) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
[...]
Forth, this may violate US EPCA user expectation legal provisions. Not
sure if it matters to you.
Neither living in nor caring about the USA: not at all. German and EU
law is complicated enough without adding foreign law into the mix. ;-)
[...]
BTW, your SendMail server accepted a no header input.
Welcome to my spam filter. ;-)
Content analysis details: (6.2 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
1.3 UNDISC_RECIPS Valid-looking To "undisclosed-recipients"
1.8 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally
1.6 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4996]
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
Yes, it was accepted and subsequently put into the junk bin. Recipient's
decision, not some entity during transport.
[...]
It would nice to know what headers it added or will behave like Hotmail
and the SendMail accept and junk too? Is this system supporting PRA?
Not yet and no, but enforcing stricter conformance to RFC822 might
reject more spam, maybe I will reconfigure the system sometime.
| X-Envelope-From: <spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com>
| X-Envelope-To: <list+spf-discuss(_at_)doeblitz(_dot_)net>
| Received: from mx1.asco.de (mx1.asco.de [217.13.70.153]) by
selene.escape.de; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:05:04 +0200
| Received: from hdev1 (adsl-10-60-163.mia.bellsouth.net [65.10.60.163])
| (envelope-sender: <spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com>)
| by mx1.asco.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with SMTP id
j5OBVTb3016692
| for <list+spf-discuss(_at_)doeblitz(_dot_)net>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:32:23
+0200
| Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:31:29 +0200
| From: spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com
| Message-Id: <200506241132(_dot_)j5OBVTb3016692(_at_)mx1(_dot_)asco(_dot_)de>
| To: undisclosed-recipients:;
| Received-SPF: pass (selene.escape.de: 217.13.70.153 is authenticated by a
trusted mechanism)
| Received-SPF: fail (mx1.asco.de: domain of spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com does
not designate 65.10.60.163 as permitted sender)
| X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.84/955/Thu Jun 23 23:08:42 2005 on
selene.doeblitz.net
| X-Virus-Status: Clean
|
| Look, no header!
Ralf Döblitz