On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Hector Santos wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Macdonald" <jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com>
Newsgroups: spf.-.sender.policy.framework.discussion
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID
Authentication
Could you please be so kind as to stop this rubbish? I would honestly
thank you. Any headers of answered mails don't have anything to search
in the reply body.
[...]
It can easily add the basic (and typical) requirements:
Date:
Message-ID:
From: <--- 2821.MailFrom
To: <---- 2821.Rcpt To
The envelope addresses and the "To:" and "From:" headers
are unlinked!
They usually correspond with each other but might also be totally
different or even empty (which might break rfc rules but wouldn't
technically prevent the message from delivery).
[...]
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
Erm... The signature introducer is "dash-dash-space-newline" not
"dash-dash-newline". Please also adopt to this quasi standard.
Regards
Henning Hucke
--
Wait ... is this a FUN THING or the END of LIFE in Petticoat
Junction??