Re: SPF test suite

Scott Kitterman wrote:

Currently it bails after the first error.


Good enough, policies are short, fixing one error after the
other should work.  For a compiler giving up after the first
error I used to be unhappy when it involved actions like
"find a free card puncher" ;-)
                                Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
SPF test suite, Lennon - Orcon Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: SPF test suite, Marc Chametzky Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: SPF test suite, Alex van den Bogaerdt RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: SPF test suite, Stuart D. Gathman Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann <= Re: Re: SPF test suite, Lennon - Orcon RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: SPF test suite, wayne RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: SPF test suite, Lennon - Orcon Re: SPF test suite, Stuart D. Gathman

Previous by Date:	RE: Re: SPF test suite, Scott Kitterman
Next by Date:	Re: SPF test suite, Frank Ellermann
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re: SPF test suite, Stuart D. Gathman
Next by Thread:	Re: Re: SPF test suite, Lennon - Orcon
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]