-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of wayne
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 12:49 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF test suite
In <NGBBLEIJOEEEBMEIAPBKAEPOILAA(_dot_)scott(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> Scott
Kitterman <spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> writes:
Hidden in domain-end = ( "." toplabel ) / macro-expand
I raise a warning on that kind of thing now.
Okay, but in that case it's also a real error. Bye, Frank
Cool. Then that's one that pySPF doesn't currently catch. More code to
write.
I wonder, do any implementations catch that one now?
libspf2 only raises a warning. I think the validator at dnsstuff.com
also raises a warning.
The folks on namedroppers thought it was important to make sure SPF
implementations *NEVER* sent out DNS queries for numeric TLDs. They
have enough problems with it as is (e.g. that have quite a bit of
hardware/bandwidth dedicated just to handle those requests), and they
don't want new code building on that problem.
OK. Well I filed it as a bug to be fixed on sourceforge for pySPF. I'll
get to it next week, I hope (if Stuart doesn't beat me to it).
Scott K